12 Points

Just what the world needed - another social network. And this one, Sonetus, comes complete with an outrageous premise - they'll pay you for referring your friends to the network.

Sonetus is brand-spanking new - it seems to have launched somewhere around January 6th, 2010 - and the designers probably shouldn't have opened it up for public consumption yet. The language pack files are completely incomplete - just look at this poll that shows up on the social network's homepage:

Oops. Usually it's a good idea to make sure that your social network is actually working properly before you start advertising that users can get paid for referring their friends to it.

The lack of language pack files isn't the only problem with the site. There are, at present, less than 200 members on Sonetus - meaning that users haven't exactly leaped at the chance to refer their friends for the promise of cold, hard cash. There are several "tiers" of membership on the site, but we couldn't really make much sense of it since the language pack files were missing. It seems that the more members you refer, the larger a payout you're entitled to receive, but beyond that there wasn't much legible information.

If you're thinking that referring friends to social networks for cash sounds too good to be true, you're probably right. Sonetus' only source of traffic-based revenue seems to be Google Adsense blocks - and if monetizing a social network were really that easy, the big guys like Facebook and Myspace would already have found a profitable business model based on the ponzi-scheme architecture that Sonetus uses. In order for Sonetus to make any money, they'll need to pull in more revenue than they're paying out to users - and that just doesn't seem particularly likely, given how small Sonetus' user base is and how little coverage they're receiving (in fact, when we tried to research Sonetus, we couldn't find a single English-language site discussing the fledgling social network).

For now, it seems, the promise of ponzi-scheme based social networking is not more than smoke and mirrors. Out of sheer curiosity, we'll be keeping an eye on Sonetus, but we don't expect to hear anything big about them, and as their hosting costs continue to mount without any large source of revenue beyond Adsense placements, they might not be around for long.

If you're really looking to make money off of social networking, you're probably going to have to do a lot more than simply refer friends. If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is - but that doesn't mean that there isn't any money to be found in social networking. Many social networking application developers see solid profits; the makers of Farmville, for example, are laughing all the way to the bank, with over 60 million people playing the game on Facebook. If you want to make money off of social networking, you're going to have to do it the old fashioned way - with a little hard work.

Jan 12, 2010

Share this post on:

Similar Twittown Posts You Might Enjoy:
Comments
Twittown Comments
Submitted by kelpet1 (not verified) on Mar 17, 2010 12:20 says:

While I don't know much about this business model I do know what constitutes a Ponzi Scheme. This must be one of those new stealth ponzi's that rips you off by NOT taking your money.

Submitted by Capri (not verified) on Feb 3, 2010 00:15 says:

Sounds like another Yuwie/Lockerz/Zenzuu copycat.People who were completely turned off and annoyed by the obnoxious Yuwie and its spammers are not going to want anything to do with Sonetus. Same old pyramid scheme MLM chain letter trying to look like a social network, and there's nothing like empty promises of fast big cash to reel people in.

Submitted by Rob on Jan 15, 2010 11:06 says:

To which my response is - since these VC companies make their livelihood off of making good investments...if there was no expectation of profit, why would these guys keep putting their money into these companies?

Amazon didn't turn a profit for nearly a decade. Now they're a powerhouse and one of the most profitable internet properties in existence - and their early VC investors are laughing all the way to the bank.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Jan 15, 2010 08:52 says:

So yeah, Zynga is a "billion dollar company" except on its website on the "Where does the money come from?" section it states that every single investor is VC: KPCB, Foundry Group, Union Square Ventures, Reid Hoffman, Institutional Venture Partners, Avalon Ventures, Clarium Capital, The Pilot Group. If the money came from this thing called "customers" then that would be different.

I am talking about profit. Number of users means nothing. Revenue means nothing. Profit is what what matters, and currently Facebook does not have enough revenue to pay off its creditors. If there is no profit, there is no business. I was in the industry in the early Noughties, I have seen the same arguments ten years ago. My question is, if there is no profit how is the business sustainable?

I really would like to see an answer: if there is a convincing argument for a Web 2.0 company, I'll be the first noob sticking my kid's college fund into it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Jan 13, 2010 09:47 says:

You have no idea what your are talking about

- first, it is not an "immature market" facebook has 350 million users, myspace has 100 million plus
- facebook has revenues in the 100s of million dollars, they don't rely on VC money to keep coming in. next year they will likely have $1B in revenue
- Zynga is also a billion dollar company and maybe even makes more than facebook. multiple game properties with 10s of millions of users i would say is sustainable (without question)
- i agree with the original article. sonetus looks like a pyramid scheme to me. sell your friends for cash.. come on

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Jan 13, 2010 08:23 says:

All these sites started with a small user base. Your point about monetization has some merit, however, you state that Farmville are seeing solid profits. I don't know anything about the company, so I'll take that statement at face value. The problem is, are these profits sustainable. If their business model is purely based around Facebook then it is simply not sustainable. Facebook (like all other social networking sites yet to turn a profit, including Twitter) are at risk of being dumped for the next, so called, latest and greatest site. The social networking site that will be the Google or Amazon of Web 2.0, will be the one that can turn a profit and free themselves from venture capital. Companies that have built their business around Facebook are betting their businesses on the Zuckerberg's ability to continue to attract VC capital. They may be right and one day Facebook might be a profitable, sustainable company but -Geocities never managed it, Myspace never managed it, and in the early Noughties many companies went to the wall because they could not do it. In terms of Web 2.0 all bets are still off. No company has the right answer, and the market is very much open to someone coming in from left-field and taking over. So, while I am completely ignorant of Sonteus, the one thing I do know is, don't write a someone off so quickly in an immature market.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options